For Coaches Training & analysis

When the plan exceeds the athlete's real time budget

How to scale a macrocycle to the hours an athlete actually has, without giving up the goal.

The mismatch

The most common reason an athlete misses plan adherence is not laziness or fitness: it is that the plan was written for hours the athlete does not actually have. A "12 hour week" with a full-time job, family, and commute is aspirational. The real budget is often 8 to 10.

The Hub does not enforce a particular volume; the plan config holds whatever you wrote. The fix is to bring the plan in line with reality.

How to find the real time budget

Ask the athlete:

Sum across a typical week. Subtract 1 to 2 hours for the margin (life happens). That is the real time budget.

How to scale the plan

If the plan calls for 12 hours and the budget is 9, you do not just cut everything by 25 percent. You decide what matters:

Keep

Cut or compress

Reframe expectations

Updating the Hub

  1. Edit the individual MacrocyclePlan config_json to reduce weekly targets per discipline.
  2. Drop the lowest-value sessions from each week (the easy aerobic fillers).
  3. Re-deploy if this is a team template change for an entire squad.

Adherence vs plan in the Hub

The macrocycle does not auto-compute adherence today (the roadmap-flagged "low adherence" view does not exist yet). The athlete dashboard shows recent volume which lets you eyeball it. Compare to planned weekly volume in the macro config.

What you do NOT do

See also: Macrocycle plan basics, Editing a deployed plan, Listing macrocycle plans.

Last updated May 12, 2026

Still stuck? Ask us a question and we'll write up an answer.

Ask a question