For Coaches
Coaching workflows
When to test, when to skip
A framework for deciding whether a fresh assessment is worth the recovery cost.
The tradeoff
Tests cost: a 20-minute FTP test takes 2 to 4 days of full
recovery; a CP test (3 min + 12 min) takes 3 to 5 days; a
metabolic test takes a full day and partial recovery. In an
8 to 12 week build, that recovery cost adds up.
The decision: is the data worth more than the lost training
time?
When to test
Definitely test
- Before an A race, 4 to 8 weeks out, if the current
zones are 90+ days old. The
race readiness check
will surface stale thresholds.
- At the start of a new training relationship. Without
baseline zones, every prescription is a guess.
- After a major training change (new periodization, new
block focus, new sport added). The old zones may not
represent the new state.
- After a major life change (4+ weeks off, illness,
significant weight change, fit change). Anything that
could plausibly move the threshold by more than 5
percent.
Probably test
- Every 6 to 8 weeks during a structured build, for any
threshold the plan depends on.
- After a peak race (the race itself often functions as
a test).
Probably skip
- Mid-block when zones were tested less than 4 to 6
weeks ago and training has been consistent.
- In recovery weeks. The test would be misleading.
- Within 2 weeks of an A race. The recovery cost is too
high; trust the zones you have.
Definitely skip
- During the taper for an A race. You go into the race
with the zones you have.
- When the athlete is sick or injured. Either you get
an artificially low value or you make the situation
worse.
- As a motivational tool. Athletes who are
motivation-shopping for a test are usually looking for a
number to validate a feeling. The number does not solve
the feeling.
Often you can update a threshold without a structured test:
- Race results: a 10K race functions as a run threshold
test. A 70.3 race functions as a long-course CP test.
Use the race FIT to extract a fresh number.
- Best 20-minute power from a hard training ride. Not
as clean as a structured test but better than 3-month-old
data.
- Best 100 m TT within a swim set if the athlete was
fresh going into it.
The Hub's
best efforts ladder and
power curve make these
extractions easy to spot.
What to do after a test
Whether the test was structured or extracted from training
data:
- Log the test as an
Assessment (see
Logging an assessment or
the dedicated assessment articles).
- Confirm the calculator-derived threshold goes into
MetricHistory as the new canonical value.
- The Hub auto-flags the new value as needs-review if it
differs by more than 20 percent from the previous
value (see Activity quality flags).
- Accept or decline the new value from the metric review
page.
Common testing mistakes
- Testing too often because "more data is better".
Recovery cost erodes the training adaptation.
- Testing under stress (work week, travel week). The
number is artificially low and you train the next block
off a bad baseline.
- Skipping the structured protocol ("I'll just do a
hard ride"). The number is not comparable to the
baseline.
See also:
Race readiness checklist,
Reviewing metric submissions,
Activity quality flags.